Pre-merger paradox – some atypical hiring
Download the PDF of this article here >>
05 May 2026
By Scott Gibson and Sloane Poulton, Directors at Edwards Gibson

The dying days of 2025 saw an unprecedented slew of law firm tie-ups: between 17 November and 18 December, no fewer than three transatlantic mergers were announced: Ashurst with Perkins Coie to form Ashurst Perkins Coie; Taylor Wessing with Winston & Strawn to form Taylor Winston; and Hogan Lovells with Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft to create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader.
“… it is somewhat surprising that, since the merger announcements … the merger candidates have collectively hired 15 partners against just 11 lateral defections to rivals.”
When law firms merge, elevated partner attrition is common - both immediately before and after the coupling - as practice overlaps, client conflicts, partner egos, and questions of relative contribution almost inevitably come into play. Far less common is for partner hires at the pre-merged legacy firms to outstrip departures. Indeed, in the period immediately following the announcement of a tie-up, legacy firms typically seek to minimise, or even freeze, lateral hiring. The rationale is straightforward: in an already delicate integration - often balanced on a knife edge - where low-level turf wars and internal power plays are distraction enough, introducing further cost, complexity, and potential conflicts via third-party arrivals risks unsettling an already fragile equilibrium.
So, it is somewhat surprising that, according to Edwards Gibson’s Law Firm Partner Moves in London, since the merger announcements began in November 2025 to the end of April 2026, the merger candidates have collectively hired 15 partners against just 11 lateral defections to rivals. This breaks down as: Ashurst (6 hires vs 4 departures); Taylor Wessing (5 hires vs 4 defections); Cadwalader (2 hires vs 1 defection); and Perkins Coie (1 hire vs 0 defections). Whilst Winston & Strawn has neither lost nor gained any laterals, Hogan Lovells stands out as the only firm in net decline, with 1 hire offset by 2 exits.
Against that wider backdrop, as Edwards Gibson’s forthcoming (92nd) edition flags, the last two months are notable for their tempo: Ashurst and Taylor Wessing alone contribute nine arrivals (a quintet and a quartet respectively), and even Cadwalader and Perkins Coie’s solitary hires are proportionately meaningful for their bonsai London partnerships – in Perkins Coie’s case lifting partner headcount by close to 15%.
Related articles:
- Year End Big Law Tie Ups - and the standout is Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
- What’s behind the escalating three-year bull run in Big Law Partner Hires in London and is it sustainable?
© Edwards Gibson 2026
Download the PDF of this article here >>
-
Pre-merger paradox – some atypical hiring
-
Uno Reverse - Kirkland vs Paul Weiss
-
The maybe (not-so) inviolate Slaughter and May
-
What’s behind the escalating three-year bull run in Big Law Partner Hires in London and is it sustainable?
-
Year End Big Law Tie Ups - and the standout is Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
-
“To: Cc or not Cc” – Clifford Chance's subversive new branding
-
Two Big Law Summer Weddings … and an Anniversary
-
Freshfields’ Non-Share Home Turf Handicap
-
Big Law Jenga: How Private Capital Stars Are Making Elite Firms Unstable
-
Big Law’s Brave “Few”, Their Inevitable Pyrrhic Victory, and Why This Is Still a Tragedy for The Rule of Law
-
No Accounting for the Big Four in Big Law
-
MIPIM 2025 Doppelgänger Style!
-
"Memery Loss" London Law Firm Memery Crystal Sinks
-
Lawyers should remember that the financial success of Big Law is predicated entirely on the Rule of Law
-
Paul Weiss - The invasive species that upset the London Big Law ecosystem
-
Paul Weiss - Happy Birthday to BigLaw's Apex Predator
-
Paul Weiss - Blackjack!
-
Breaking The Circle - the real significance of Freshfields pay bonanza is far more profound than just another Big Law salary arms race.
-
A lawyer's progress to partnership... and the closing window of opportunity
-
Linklaters – Welcome to the “Hotel California” of Big Law; “You can check out anytime you like but you can never leave”
-
The Pecking Order at MIPIM; believe it or not Real Estate Lawyers are not at the bottom!
-
Parallels in Peril, two midsize law firms – Axiom Ince and Stroock & Stroock & Lavan – collapse in the same month
-
And you thought $20 million was a lot for a lawyer…
-
Legal Upheaval: Kirkland & Ellis and Paul Weiss Exchange Blows
-
So, it’s A&O Shearman!
-
Real Estate lawyers - beware the £1,000 fish, and the true meaning of MIPIM … (literally)
-
Previous Issues of Partner Moves
-
Edwards Gibson Methodology for Compiling Partner Moves
-
Quantifying your following and writing an effective law firm business plan
-
Sample law firm business plan
-
The Partnership Track and Moving for Immediate Partnership
-
Legal directory rankings and their effect on lawyer recruitment
-
Restrictive Covenants and Moving on as a Partner
-
Competency Based Interviews - an overview
-
Verbal reasoning tests
-
Recruiting in-house lawyers - a guide for General Counsel/Legal Directors
-
London Law Firm Assistants Salary and Bonus, Trends and Predictions 2014-15
-
Compensation Packages for Expat US Lawyers in London – ‘COLAs’ Explained
-
London Law Firm Assistants Salary and Bonus, Trends and Predictions 2013-14
-
The In-House Triumph over Law Firms - A Pyrrhic victory?
-
London Law Firm Assistants Salary and Bonus, Trends and Predictions 2012-13
-
London Law Firm Partner Compensation 2012-13
-
The rise and fall of the elite investment bank lawyer
-
Attracting and retaining top talent to an in-house legal department
-
London Law Firm Assistants Salary and Bonus, Trends and Predictions 2011-12
-
FAQs about legal recruiting
-
The successful business lawyer
