WilmerHale - The Born Defection
Download the PDF of this article here >>
29 June 2026
By Scott Gibson and Sloane Poulton, Directors at Edwards Gibson

Every so often, the London lateral market produces a move that feels less like partner recruitment and more like the transfer of an institutional asset. King & Spalding’s June 2026 hire of an eight-partner, market-leading international arbitration and public international law team from WilmerHale — spanning London, Washington DC and New York, and led by “Hall of Fame” lawyer and sometime published novelist Gary Born — firmly falls into that category.
In London, the Atlanta-spawned outfit welcomes a sextet of laterals, including Born, who joins as co-head of international disputes.
Even without Born, the London WilmerHale team — containing several market-leading individuals and comfortably Band 1 in its own right — is truly formidable. But because Born, who has been practising for more than 40 years, is the closest thing to a universally accepted “most famous arbitration lawyer” in the world today, the team is, perhaps unfairly, synonymous with him, with some in the market describing it as “the Gary Born show”.
For King & Spalding — already Tier 1 by GAR — the move is less 'Born Identity' than 'Born Supremacy'.
For King & Spalding, already ranked Tier 1 by GAR — the Global Arbitration Review and, in international arbitration the only ranking that really counts — the move is less Born Identity than Born Supremacy. Subject to the usual integration risks that come with absorbing culturally distinct, big-personality disputes laterals, it has the potential to place the firm’s arbitration practice in a league of its own.
That said, the hire is not entirely without risk for King & Spalding. Born is very senior — he has been in practice for more than 40 years — and, rightly or wrongly, a significant proportion of the team’s market value is linked to his name.
For WilmerHale’s London office, the consequences are sharper. In the US, the firm remains a formidable brand synonymous with quality and, although notionally full service, is primarily perceived as a disputes, regulatory and life sciences powerhouse rather than a competitor to Big Law’s private capital-driven transactional elite, which now operates on a different economic plane.
In London, the firm has played to those strengths, completely side-stepping Big Law’s private capital lateral arms race and instead focusing on three prestige pillars: IP/patent litigation, corporate crime, and international arbitration/public international law. It is a high-quality, low-growth model built around standout individuals, but one with clear concentration risk.
As recently as last year, WilmerHale could point to genuinely top-of-market individuals leading all three areas: Justin Watts (IP/patent litigation), Stephen Pollard (corporate crime), and Gary Born (international arbitration). However, with Watts and Pollard stepping back from the partnership over the past 18 months, and now the entirety of Born’s team defecting to King & Spalding, the vulnerability of that model has been exposed.
For WilmerHale’s London office, the consequences are sharper — a high-quality, low-growth model built around standout individuals, but one with clear concentration risk.
Growth in London has been sedate. Until very recently, the office had a reputation for making very few internal promotions and, on hiring, Edwards Gibson records just seven partner hires since its records began in 2007. Absent international arbitration, this historic lack of growth leaves the London office with just five partners (one of whom splits time between London and Brussels).
From a Mayfair base — in the UK version of Monopoly, the most expensive square — the economics of such a bonsai office will be challenging. The firm will need to scale up simply to balance the books, let alone retain its premium disputes brand outside of the US.
In a Big Law market increasingly defined by platform economics, momentum and depth matter as much as individual brilliance. Elite firms can still be built around star practitioners — but without sustained investment in growth, succession and breadth, even the most prestigious franchises risk being reduced, ultimately, to the sum of the individuals who leave. Right now, WilmerHale’s London office looks less like a curated disputes boutique and more like a case study in why law firms need to grow.
© Edwards Gibson 2026
Download the PDF of this article here >>
-
WilmerHale - The Born Defection
-
Pre-merger paradox – some atypical hiring
-
Uno Reverse - Kirkland vs Paul Weiss
-
The maybe (not-so) inviolate Slaughter and May
-
What’s behind the escalating three-year bull run in Big Law Partner Hires in London and is it sustainable?
-
Year End Big Law Tie Ups - and the standout is Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
-
“To: Cc or not Cc” – Clifford Chance's subversive new branding
-
Two Big Law Summer Weddings … and an Anniversary
-
Freshfields’ Non-Share Home Turf Handicap
-
Big Law Jenga: How Private Capital Stars Are Making Elite Firms Unstable
-
Big Law’s Brave “Few”, Their Inevitable Pyrrhic Victory, and Why This Is Still a Tragedy for The Rule of Law
-
No Accounting for the Big Four in Big Law
-
MIPIM 2025 Doppelgänger Style!
-
"Memery Loss" London Law Firm Memery Crystal Sinks
-
Lawyers should remember that the financial success of Big Law is predicated entirely on the Rule of Law
-
Paul Weiss - The invasive species that upset the London Big Law ecosystem
-
Paul Weiss - Happy Birthday to BigLaw's Apex Predator
-
Paul Weiss - Blackjack!
-
Breaking The Circle - the real significance of Freshfields pay bonanza is far more profound than just another Big Law salary arms race.
-
A lawyer's progress to partnership... and the closing window of opportunity
-
Linklaters – Welcome to the “Hotel California” of Big Law; “You can check out anytime you like but you can never leave”
-
The Pecking Order at MIPIM; believe it or not Real Estate Lawyers are not at the bottom!
-
Parallels in Peril, two midsize law firms – Axiom Ince and Stroock & Stroock & Lavan – collapse in the same month
-
And you thought $20 million was a lot for a lawyer…
-
Legal Upheaval: Kirkland & Ellis and Paul Weiss Exchange Blows
-
So, it’s A&O Shearman!
-
Real Estate lawyers - beware the £1,000 fish, and the true meaning of MIPIM … (literally)
-
Previous Issues of Partner Moves
-
Edwards Gibson Methodology for Compiling Partner Moves
-
Quantifying your following and writing an effective law firm business plan
-
Sample law firm business plan
-
The Partnership Track and Moving for Immediate Partnership
-
Legal directory rankings and their effect on lawyer recruitment
-
Restrictive Covenants and Moving on as a Partner
-
Competency Based Interviews - an overview
-
Verbal reasoning tests
-
Recruiting in-house lawyers - a guide for General Counsel/Legal Directors
-
London Law Firm Assistants Salary and Bonus, Trends and Predictions 2014-15
-
Compensation Packages for Expat US Lawyers in London – ‘COLAs’ Explained
-
London Law Firm Assistants Salary and Bonus, Trends and Predictions 2013-14
-
The In-House Triumph over Law Firms - A Pyrrhic victory?
-
London Law Firm Assistants Salary and Bonus, Trends and Predictions 2012-13
-
London Law Firm Partner Compensation 2012-13
-
The rise and fall of the elite investment bank lawyer
-
Attracting and retaining top talent to an in-house legal department
-
London Law Firm Assistants Salary and Bonus, Trends and Predictions 2011-12
-
FAQs about legal recruiting
-
The successful business lawyer
